system generator (version 14.2) Search Results


92
Revvity anti cxcr3
a) Relative expression of IFN-gamma, IL-17a and IL-17f mRNA transcripts were determined from mTOR hi and mTOR lo populations immediately after sorting stimulated 5c.c7 Rag –/— splenocytes. Error bars show ± S.D. from 3 independent experiments, and mTOR hi values were set to 1. b-d ) Sorted populations of cells were cultured in media supplemented with IL-2 for 3 days prior to assessment. b ) Expression of chemokine receptor, <t>CXCR3,</t> and LFA-1 subunit CD11a was determined by flow cytometry. MFI per population is shown at the top of each FACs plot. c ) Relative expression of Foxp3 mRNA transcript ± S.D. was determined from the mTOR lo population compared to the mTOR hi cells. The graph was generated from 3 independent experiments, and mTOR hi values were set to 1. d) Foxp3 protein expression was determined from sorted mTOR lo and mTOR hi populations 3 days after culture in IL-2 alone or IL-2 + TGF-ß. Bar graphs to the right depict % Foxp3+ cells ± S.D. generated in each population from 3 independent experiments. e ) mTOR lo Foxp3+ regulatory T cells possess the ability to suppress the proliferation of naïve CD4+ T cells. Sorted mTOR hi or mTOR lo populations were cultured in media supplemented with IL-2 for 3 days prior to use in the suppression assay. The percentage of non-divided responders was determined by CFSE dilution 72hrs after culture of 1:2 suppressors: responders in direct contact or in transwell suppression assays. The graphs to the right depict the percentage of non-divided responders after culture with mTOR hi or mTOR lo ‘suppressors’ from 3 independent experiments. Connecting lines show values from sorted populations from the same experiment. The data are representative of at least 3 independent experiments or show cumulative results.
Anti Cxcr3, supplied by Revvity, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti cxcr3/product/Revvity
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti cxcr3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
Miltenyi Biotec human mouse cd11b
Evaluation of direct immunoregulatory action of HM butyrate on human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs): modulation of mono‐dendritic cell expression. PBMCs from children with IgE‐mediated FA were stimulated with butyrate HM median concentration (0.75 mM) or with specific allergen (BLG, OVA, PN) (100 μL/well of each allergen) in the presence or in the absence of butyrate for 48 h (A‐B). CD45hi CD14+ monocytes were stained with flow cytometric markers CD206+ or CD86+ to discern the CD206 M2 type from CD86 M1 type of total monocytes. A representative dot plot panel (left panel) is presented. The graph on the right reports the mean ± SD of ratios of M1 vs M2 peripheral monocytes (CD86/CD206 ratio) from different FA patients (ANOVA; *** P < .001 vs CTRL) (B). Purified CD14+ monocytes from IgE‐mediated FA were cultured with regular medium containing GM‐CSF (50 ng/mL) and IL‐4 (1000 U/mL), with or without butyrate HM median concentration (0.75 mM). After 7 d, cells were collected, stained with the reported antibodies, and analyzed by flow cytometry (C‐E). Representative example of dot plots of iDCs generated in the presence or in the absence of butyrate (C). The bars graph reports mean and standard deviation of % of CD14‐CD1a+ from independent experiments using different IgE‐mediated FA (ANOVA; *** P < .001 vs CTRL). (D). Immature DCs were collected and exposed to LPS‐activating stimulus (1 μg/mL). After 24 h, cells were stained for CD86 maturation marker. Bar graphs report the percentage of positive cells for the indicated markers in gated viable CD14‐CD1a+ cells (ANOVA; *** P < .001 vs CTRL) (E). Phenotypical characterization of iDCs generated in the presence or in the absence of 0.75 mM of butyrate for 7 d in healthy subjects (left panel) and in IgE‐mediated FA (right panel). Bar graph reports mean and standard deviation of % of <t>CD11b+</t> CD103+ from independent experiments using IgE‐mediated FA (ANOVA; *** P < .001 vs CTRL). (F‐G). Butyrate‐DC had no effect on regulatory cell differentiation. Naïve CD4+ T cells from IgE‐mediated FA were cultured with immature or mature DCs generated in the presence of butyrate at 1:10 DC:T ratio. After being cultured for 5 d, cells were collected. CD4+CD25+CD127 dim/ⁿeg Tregs were identified and enumerated with a flow cytometer (H). The bar graphs report the percentage of positive cells for the indicated markers
Human Mouse Cd11b, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human mouse cd11b/product/Miltenyi Biotec
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human mouse cd11b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Illumina Inc hiseq 2000
Evaluation of direct immunoregulatory action of HM butyrate on human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs): modulation of mono‐dendritic cell expression. PBMCs from children with IgE‐mediated FA were stimulated with butyrate HM median concentration (0.75 mM) or with specific allergen (BLG, OVA, PN) (100 μL/well of each allergen) in the presence or in the absence of butyrate for 48 h (A‐B). CD45hi CD14+ monocytes were stained with flow cytometric markers CD206+ or CD86+ to discern the CD206 M2 type from CD86 M1 type of total monocytes. A representative dot plot panel (left panel) is presented. The graph on the right reports the mean ± SD of ratios of M1 vs M2 peripheral monocytes (CD86/CD206 ratio) from different FA patients (ANOVA; *** P < .001 vs CTRL) (B). Purified CD14+ monocytes from IgE‐mediated FA were cultured with regular medium containing GM‐CSF (50 ng/mL) and IL‐4 (1000 U/mL), with or without butyrate HM median concentration (0.75 mM). After 7 d, cells were collected, stained with the reported antibodies, and analyzed by flow cytometry (C‐E). Representative example of dot plots of iDCs generated in the presence or in the absence of butyrate (C). The bars graph reports mean and standard deviation of % of CD14‐CD1a+ from independent experiments using different IgE‐mediated FA (ANOVA; *** P < .001 vs CTRL). (D). Immature DCs were collected and exposed to LPS‐activating stimulus (1 μg/mL). After 24 h, cells were stained for CD86 maturation marker. Bar graphs report the percentage of positive cells for the indicated markers in gated viable CD14‐CD1a+ cells (ANOVA; *** P < .001 vs CTRL) (E). Phenotypical characterization of iDCs generated in the presence or in the absence of 0.75 mM of butyrate for 7 d in healthy subjects (left panel) and in IgE‐mediated FA (right panel). Bar graph reports mean and standard deviation of % of <t>CD11b+</t> CD103+ from independent experiments using IgE‐mediated FA (ANOVA; *** P < .001 vs CTRL). (F‐G). Butyrate‐DC had no effect on regulatory cell differentiation. Naïve CD4+ T cells from IgE‐mediated FA were cultured with immature or mature DCs generated in the presence of butyrate at 1:10 DC:T ratio. After being cultured for 5 d, cells were collected. CD4+CD25+CD127 dim/ⁿeg Tregs were identified and enumerated with a flow cytometer (H). The bar graphs report the percentage of positive cells for the indicated markers
Hiseq 2000, supplied by Illumina Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/hiseq 2000/product/Illumina Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hiseq 2000 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Biognosys spectronaut version 14.2
Evaluation of direct immunoregulatory action of HM butyrate on human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs): modulation of mono‐dendritic cell expression. PBMCs from children with IgE‐mediated FA were stimulated with butyrate HM median concentration (0.75 mM) or with specific allergen (BLG, OVA, PN) (100 μL/well of each allergen) in the presence or in the absence of butyrate for 48 h (A‐B). CD45hi CD14+ monocytes were stained with flow cytometric markers CD206+ or CD86+ to discern the CD206 M2 type from CD86 M1 type of total monocytes. A representative dot plot panel (left panel) is presented. The graph on the right reports the mean ± SD of ratios of M1 vs M2 peripheral monocytes (CD86/CD206 ratio) from different FA patients (ANOVA; *** P < .001 vs CTRL) (B). Purified CD14+ monocytes from IgE‐mediated FA were cultured with regular medium containing GM‐CSF (50 ng/mL) and IL‐4 (1000 U/mL), with or without butyrate HM median concentration (0.75 mM). After 7 d, cells were collected, stained with the reported antibodies, and analyzed by flow cytometry (C‐E). Representative example of dot plots of iDCs generated in the presence or in the absence of butyrate (C). The bars graph reports mean and standard deviation of % of CD14‐CD1a+ from independent experiments using different IgE‐mediated FA (ANOVA; *** P < .001 vs CTRL). (D). Immature DCs were collected and exposed to LPS‐activating stimulus (1 μg/mL). After 24 h, cells were stained for CD86 maturation marker. Bar graphs report the percentage of positive cells for the indicated markers in gated viable CD14‐CD1a+ cells (ANOVA; *** P < .001 vs CTRL) (E). Phenotypical characterization of iDCs generated in the presence or in the absence of 0.75 mM of butyrate for 7 d in healthy subjects (left panel) and in IgE‐mediated FA (right panel). Bar graph reports mean and standard deviation of % of <t>CD11b+</t> CD103+ from independent experiments using IgE‐mediated FA (ANOVA; *** P < .001 vs CTRL). (F‐G). Butyrate‐DC had no effect on regulatory cell differentiation. Naïve CD4+ T cells from IgE‐mediated FA were cultured with immature or mature DCs generated in the presence of butyrate at 1:10 DC:T ratio. After being cultured for 5 d, cells were collected. CD4+CD25+CD127 dim/ⁿeg Tregs were identified and enumerated with a flow cytometer (H). The bar graphs report the percentage of positive cells for the indicated markers
Spectronaut Version 14.2, supplied by Biognosys, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/spectronaut version 14.2/product/Biognosys
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
spectronaut version 14.2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
Miltenyi Biotec anti ter119 biotin
Evaluation of direct immunoregulatory action of HM butyrate on human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs): modulation of mono‐dendritic cell expression. PBMCs from children with IgE‐mediated FA were stimulated with butyrate HM median concentration (0.75 mM) or with specific allergen (BLG, OVA, PN) (100 μL/well of each allergen) in the presence or in the absence of butyrate for 48 h (A‐B). CD45hi CD14+ monocytes were stained with flow cytometric markers CD206+ or CD86+ to discern the CD206 M2 type from CD86 M1 type of total monocytes. A representative dot plot panel (left panel) is presented. The graph on the right reports the mean ± SD of ratios of M1 vs M2 peripheral monocytes (CD86/CD206 ratio) from different FA patients (ANOVA; *** P < .001 vs CTRL) (B). Purified CD14+ monocytes from IgE‐mediated FA were cultured with regular medium containing GM‐CSF (50 ng/mL) and IL‐4 (1000 U/mL), with or without butyrate HM median concentration (0.75 mM). After 7 d, cells were collected, stained with the reported antibodies, and analyzed by flow cytometry (C‐E). Representative example of dot plots of iDCs generated in the presence or in the absence of butyrate (C). The bars graph reports mean and standard deviation of % of CD14‐CD1a+ from independent experiments using different IgE‐mediated FA (ANOVA; *** P < .001 vs CTRL). (D). Immature DCs were collected and exposed to LPS‐activating stimulus (1 μg/mL). After 24 h, cells were stained for CD86 maturation marker. Bar graphs report the percentage of positive cells for the indicated markers in gated viable CD14‐CD1a+ cells (ANOVA; *** P < .001 vs CTRL) (E). Phenotypical characterization of iDCs generated in the presence or in the absence of 0.75 mM of butyrate for 7 d in healthy subjects (left panel) and in IgE‐mediated FA (right panel). Bar graph reports mean and standard deviation of % of <t>CD11b+</t> CD103+ from independent experiments using IgE‐mediated FA (ANOVA; *** P < .001 vs CTRL). (F‐G). Butyrate‐DC had no effect on regulatory cell differentiation. Naïve CD4+ T cells from IgE‐mediated FA were cultured with immature or mature DCs generated in the presence of butyrate at 1:10 DC:T ratio. After being cultured for 5 d, cells were collected. CD4+CD25+CD127 dim/ⁿeg Tregs were identified and enumerated with a flow cytometer (H). The bar graphs report the percentage of positive cells for the indicated markers
Anti Ter119 Biotin, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti ter119 biotin/product/Miltenyi Biotec
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti ter119 biotin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
STATA Corporation stata version 14.2
Evaluation of direct immunoregulatory action of HM butyrate on human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs): modulation of mono‐dendritic cell expression. PBMCs from children with IgE‐mediated FA were stimulated with butyrate HM median concentration (0.75 mM) or with specific allergen (BLG, OVA, PN) (100 μL/well of each allergen) in the presence or in the absence of butyrate for 48 h (A‐B). CD45hi CD14+ monocytes were stained with flow cytometric markers CD206+ or CD86+ to discern the CD206 M2 type from CD86 M1 type of total monocytes. A representative dot plot panel (left panel) is presented. The graph on the right reports the mean ± SD of ratios of M1 vs M2 peripheral monocytes (CD86/CD206 ratio) from different FA patients (ANOVA; *** P < .001 vs CTRL) (B). Purified CD14+ monocytes from IgE‐mediated FA were cultured with regular medium containing GM‐CSF (50 ng/mL) and IL‐4 (1000 U/mL), with or without butyrate HM median concentration (0.75 mM). After 7 d, cells were collected, stained with the reported antibodies, and analyzed by flow cytometry (C‐E). Representative example of dot plots of iDCs generated in the presence or in the absence of butyrate (C). The bars graph reports mean and standard deviation of % of CD14‐CD1a+ from independent experiments using different IgE‐mediated FA (ANOVA; *** P < .001 vs CTRL). (D). Immature DCs were collected and exposed to LPS‐activating stimulus (1 μg/mL). After 24 h, cells were stained for CD86 maturation marker. Bar graphs report the percentage of positive cells for the indicated markers in gated viable CD14‐CD1a+ cells (ANOVA; *** P < .001 vs CTRL) (E). Phenotypical characterization of iDCs generated in the presence or in the absence of 0.75 mM of butyrate for 7 d in healthy subjects (left panel) and in IgE‐mediated FA (right panel). Bar graph reports mean and standard deviation of % of <t>CD11b+</t> CD103+ from independent experiments using IgE‐mediated FA (ANOVA; *** P < .001 vs CTRL). (F‐G). Butyrate‐DC had no effect on regulatory cell differentiation. Naïve CD4+ T cells from IgE‐mediated FA were cultured with immature or mature DCs generated in the presence of butyrate at 1:10 DC:T ratio. After being cultured for 5 d, cells were collected. CD4+CD25+CD127 dim/ⁿeg Tregs were identified and enumerated with a flow cytometer (H). The bar graphs report the percentage of positive cells for the indicated markers
Stata Version 14.2, supplied by STATA Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/stata version 14.2/product/STATA Corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
stata version 14.2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Jackson Laboratory snp markers
Evaluation of direct immunoregulatory action of HM butyrate on human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs): modulation of mono‐dendritic cell expression. PBMCs from children with IgE‐mediated FA were stimulated with butyrate HM median concentration (0.75 mM) or with specific allergen (BLG, OVA, PN) (100 μL/well of each allergen) in the presence or in the absence of butyrate for 48 h (A‐B). CD45hi CD14+ monocytes were stained with flow cytometric markers CD206+ or CD86+ to discern the CD206 M2 type from CD86 M1 type of total monocytes. A representative dot plot panel (left panel) is presented. The graph on the right reports the mean ± SD of ratios of M1 vs M2 peripheral monocytes (CD86/CD206 ratio) from different FA patients (ANOVA; *** P < .001 vs CTRL) (B). Purified CD14+ monocytes from IgE‐mediated FA were cultured with regular medium containing GM‐CSF (50 ng/mL) and IL‐4 (1000 U/mL), with or without butyrate HM median concentration (0.75 mM). After 7 d, cells were collected, stained with the reported antibodies, and analyzed by flow cytometry (C‐E). Representative example of dot plots of iDCs generated in the presence or in the absence of butyrate (C). The bars graph reports mean and standard deviation of % of CD14‐CD1a+ from independent experiments using different IgE‐mediated FA (ANOVA; *** P < .001 vs CTRL). (D). Immature DCs were collected and exposed to LPS‐activating stimulus (1 μg/mL). After 24 h, cells were stained for CD86 maturation marker. Bar graphs report the percentage of positive cells for the indicated markers in gated viable CD14‐CD1a+ cells (ANOVA; *** P < .001 vs CTRL) (E). Phenotypical characterization of iDCs generated in the presence or in the absence of 0.75 mM of butyrate for 7 d in healthy subjects (left panel) and in IgE‐mediated FA (right panel). Bar graph reports mean and standard deviation of % of <t>CD11b+</t> CD103+ from independent experiments using IgE‐mediated FA (ANOVA; *** P < .001 vs CTRL). (F‐G). Butyrate‐DC had no effect on regulatory cell differentiation. Naïve CD4+ T cells from IgE‐mediated FA were cultured with immature or mature DCs generated in the presence of butyrate at 1:10 DC:T ratio. After being cultured for 5 d, cells were collected. CD4+CD25+CD127 dim/ⁿeg Tregs were identified and enumerated with a flow cytometer (H). The bar graphs report the percentage of positive cells for the indicated markers
Snp Markers, supplied by Jackson Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/snp markers/product/Jackson Laboratory
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
snp markers - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Santa Cruz Biotechnology parp1
DNA repair genes and their associated DNA repair-related pathways investigated in this study.
Parp1, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/parp1/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
parp1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Jena Bioscience 142 bp dsrna positive control
DNA repair genes and their associated DNA repair-related pathways investigated in this study.
142 Bp Dsrna Positive Control, supplied by Jena Bioscience, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/142 bp dsrna positive control/product/Jena Bioscience
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
142 bp dsrna positive control - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Ingenuity Systems ingenuity pathways analysis
DNA repair genes and their associated DNA repair-related pathways investigated in this study.
Ingenuity Pathways Analysis, supplied by Ingenuity Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ingenuity pathways analysis/product/Ingenuity Systems
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ingenuity pathways analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Novus Biologicals mre11
DNA repair genes and their associated DNA repair-related pathways investigated in this study.
Mre11, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mre11/product/Novus Biologicals
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mre11 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
SYSTAT sigmaplot 10.0
DNA repair genes and their associated DNA repair-related pathways investigated in this study.
Sigmaplot 10.0, supplied by SYSTAT, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/sigmaplot 10.0/product/SYSTAT
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sigmaplot 10.0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


a) Relative expression of IFN-gamma, IL-17a and IL-17f mRNA transcripts were determined from mTOR hi and mTOR lo populations immediately after sorting stimulated 5c.c7 Rag –/— splenocytes. Error bars show ± S.D. from 3 independent experiments, and mTOR hi values were set to 1. b-d ) Sorted populations of cells were cultured in media supplemented with IL-2 for 3 days prior to assessment. b ) Expression of chemokine receptor, CXCR3, and LFA-1 subunit CD11a was determined by flow cytometry. MFI per population is shown at the top of each FACs plot. c ) Relative expression of Foxp3 mRNA transcript ± S.D. was determined from the mTOR lo population compared to the mTOR hi cells. The graph was generated from 3 independent experiments, and mTOR hi values were set to 1. d) Foxp3 protein expression was determined from sorted mTOR lo and mTOR hi populations 3 days after culture in IL-2 alone or IL-2 + TGF-ß. Bar graphs to the right depict % Foxp3+ cells ± S.D. generated in each population from 3 independent experiments. e ) mTOR lo Foxp3+ regulatory T cells possess the ability to suppress the proliferation of naïve CD4+ T cells. Sorted mTOR hi or mTOR lo populations were cultured in media supplemented with IL-2 for 3 days prior to use in the suppression assay. The percentage of non-divided responders was determined by CFSE dilution 72hrs after culture of 1:2 suppressors: responders in direct contact or in transwell suppression assays. The graphs to the right depict the percentage of non-divided responders after culture with mTOR hi or mTOR lo ‘suppressors’ from 3 independent experiments. Connecting lines show values from sorted populations from the same experiment. The data are representative of at least 3 independent experiments or show cumulative results.

Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: Cellular Size as a Means of Tracking mTOR Activity and Cell Fate of CD4+ T Cells upon Antigen Recognition

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121710

Figure Lengend Snippet: a) Relative expression of IFN-gamma, IL-17a and IL-17f mRNA transcripts were determined from mTOR hi and mTOR lo populations immediately after sorting stimulated 5c.c7 Rag –/— splenocytes. Error bars show ± S.D. from 3 independent experiments, and mTOR hi values were set to 1. b-d ) Sorted populations of cells were cultured in media supplemented with IL-2 for 3 days prior to assessment. b ) Expression of chemokine receptor, CXCR3, and LFA-1 subunit CD11a was determined by flow cytometry. MFI per population is shown at the top of each FACs plot. c ) Relative expression of Foxp3 mRNA transcript ± S.D. was determined from the mTOR lo population compared to the mTOR hi cells. The graph was generated from 3 independent experiments, and mTOR hi values were set to 1. d) Foxp3 protein expression was determined from sorted mTOR lo and mTOR hi populations 3 days after culture in IL-2 alone or IL-2 + TGF-ß. Bar graphs to the right depict % Foxp3+ cells ± S.D. generated in each population from 3 independent experiments. e ) mTOR lo Foxp3+ regulatory T cells possess the ability to suppress the proliferation of naïve CD4+ T cells. Sorted mTOR hi or mTOR lo populations were cultured in media supplemented with IL-2 for 3 days prior to use in the suppression assay. The percentage of non-divided responders was determined by CFSE dilution 72hrs after culture of 1:2 suppressors: responders in direct contact or in transwell suppression assays. The graphs to the right depict the percentage of non-divided responders after culture with mTOR hi or mTOR lo ‘suppressors’ from 3 independent experiments. Connecting lines show values from sorted populations from the same experiment. The data are representative of at least 3 independent experiments or show cumulative results.

Article Snippet: Anti-Bcl-2 (BCL/10C4) and anti-CXCR3 (CXCR3-173) were purchased from Biolegend.

Techniques: Expressing, Cell Culture, Flow Cytometry, Generated, Suppression Assay

Evaluation of direct immunoregulatory action of HM butyrate on human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs): modulation of mono‐dendritic cell expression. PBMCs from children with IgE‐mediated FA were stimulated with butyrate HM median concentration (0.75 mM) or with specific allergen (BLG, OVA, PN) (100 μL/well of each allergen) in the presence or in the absence of butyrate for 48 h (A‐B). CD45hi CD14+ monocytes were stained with flow cytometric markers CD206+ or CD86+ to discern the CD206 M2 type from CD86 M1 type of total monocytes. A representative dot plot panel (left panel) is presented. The graph on the right reports the mean ± SD of ratios of M1 vs M2 peripheral monocytes (CD86/CD206 ratio) from different FA patients (ANOVA; *** P < .001 vs CTRL) (B). Purified CD14+ monocytes from IgE‐mediated FA were cultured with regular medium containing GM‐CSF (50 ng/mL) and IL‐4 (1000 U/mL), with or without butyrate HM median concentration (0.75 mM). After 7 d, cells were collected, stained with the reported antibodies, and analyzed by flow cytometry (C‐E). Representative example of dot plots of iDCs generated in the presence or in the absence of butyrate (C). The bars graph reports mean and standard deviation of % of CD14‐CD1a+ from independent experiments using different IgE‐mediated FA (ANOVA; *** P < .001 vs CTRL). (D). Immature DCs were collected and exposed to LPS‐activating stimulus (1 μg/mL). After 24 h, cells were stained for CD86 maturation marker. Bar graphs report the percentage of positive cells for the indicated markers in gated viable CD14‐CD1a+ cells (ANOVA; *** P < .001 vs CTRL) (E). Phenotypical characterization of iDCs generated in the presence or in the absence of 0.75 mM of butyrate for 7 d in healthy subjects (left panel) and in IgE‐mediated FA (right panel). Bar graph reports mean and standard deviation of % of CD11b+ CD103+ from independent experiments using IgE‐mediated FA (ANOVA; *** P < .001 vs CTRL). (F‐G). Butyrate‐DC had no effect on regulatory cell differentiation. Naïve CD4+ T cells from IgE‐mediated FA were cultured with immature or mature DCs generated in the presence of butyrate at 1:10 DC:T ratio. After being cultured for 5 d, cells were collected. CD4+CD25+CD127 dim/ⁿeg Tregs were identified and enumerated with a flow cytometer (H). The bar graphs report the percentage of positive cells for the indicated markers

Journal: Allergy

Article Title: Butyrate as a bioactive human milk protective component against food allergy

doi: 10.1111/all.14625

Figure Lengend Snippet: Evaluation of direct immunoregulatory action of HM butyrate on human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs): modulation of mono‐dendritic cell expression. PBMCs from children with IgE‐mediated FA were stimulated with butyrate HM median concentration (0.75 mM) or with specific allergen (BLG, OVA, PN) (100 μL/well of each allergen) in the presence or in the absence of butyrate for 48 h (A‐B). CD45hi CD14+ monocytes were stained with flow cytometric markers CD206+ or CD86+ to discern the CD206 M2 type from CD86 M1 type of total monocytes. A representative dot plot panel (left panel) is presented. The graph on the right reports the mean ± SD of ratios of M1 vs M2 peripheral monocytes (CD86/CD206 ratio) from different FA patients (ANOVA; *** P < .001 vs CTRL) (B). Purified CD14+ monocytes from IgE‐mediated FA were cultured with regular medium containing GM‐CSF (50 ng/mL) and IL‐4 (1000 U/mL), with or without butyrate HM median concentration (0.75 mM). After 7 d, cells were collected, stained with the reported antibodies, and analyzed by flow cytometry (C‐E). Representative example of dot plots of iDCs generated in the presence or in the absence of butyrate (C). The bars graph reports mean and standard deviation of % of CD14‐CD1a+ from independent experiments using different IgE‐mediated FA (ANOVA; *** P < .001 vs CTRL). (D). Immature DCs were collected and exposed to LPS‐activating stimulus (1 μg/mL). After 24 h, cells were stained for CD86 maturation marker. Bar graphs report the percentage of positive cells for the indicated markers in gated viable CD14‐CD1a+ cells (ANOVA; *** P < .001 vs CTRL) (E). Phenotypical characterization of iDCs generated in the presence or in the absence of 0.75 mM of butyrate for 7 d in healthy subjects (left panel) and in IgE‐mediated FA (right panel). Bar graph reports mean and standard deviation of % of CD11b+ CD103+ from independent experiments using IgE‐mediated FA (ANOVA; *** P < .001 vs CTRL). (F‐G). Butyrate‐DC had no effect on regulatory cell differentiation. Naïve CD4+ T cells from IgE‐mediated FA were cultured with immature or mature DCs generated in the presence of butyrate at 1:10 DC:T ratio. After being cultured for 5 d, cells were collected. CD4+CD25+CD127 dim/ⁿeg Tregs were identified and enumerated with a flow cytometer (H). The bar graphs report the percentage of positive cells for the indicated markers

Article Snippet: Single‐cell suspensions from PBMCs were stained with mAb against human CD14 (HCD14; BioLegend), human CD206 (DCN228; Miltenyi Biotec), human/mouse CD11b (M1/70.15.11.5; Miltenyi Biotec), human CD1a (HI149; Miltenyi Biotec), human CD1a (HI149; Miltenyi Biotec), human CD86 (REA968; Miltenyi Biotec), human CCR7 (REA108; Miltenyi Biotec), human CD45 RA (T6D11; Miltenyi Biotec), CD4 (A161A1; BioLegend), and human CD103 (REA803; Miltenyi Biotec).

Techniques: Expressing, Concentration Assay, Staining, Purification, Cell Culture, Flow Cytometry, Generated, Standard Deviation, Marker, Cell Differentiation

DNA repair genes and their associated DNA repair-related pathways investigated in this study.

Journal: Cells

Article Title: Lasting DNA Damage and Aberrant DNA Repair Gene Expression Profile Are Associated with Post-Chronic Cadmium Exposure in Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells

doi: 10.3390/cells8080842

Figure Lengend Snippet: DNA repair genes and their associated DNA repair-related pathways investigated in this study.

Article Snippet: Antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology: ATR (sc-515173); ATM (sc-377293); CDK7 (sc-365075); ERCC1 (sc-17809); LIG3 (sc-390922); NEIL1 (sc-271164); NEIL3 (sc-393703); PARP1 (sc-8007); PMS2 (sc-25315); SMUG1 (sc-377370); SUMO1 (sc-5308), GeneTex: ERCC2 (GTX108948); TP53 (GTX70214), Sigma-Aldrich: ACTB (A5441), ABClonal: H2AFX (A11361), and Cell Signaling Technology: H3 (4499).

Techniques: Non-Homologous End Joining, Translesion Synthesis, Modification